2020-07-16

Being exposed to create a”homicide case”, Li Changyu:never said that the blood stains on the evidence belong to the suspect

By yqqlm yqqlm
getInterUrl?uicrIvZQ=0e0b0f58268f5a0acbb77819a9f08a16 - Being exposed to create a"homicide case", Li Changyu:never said that the blood stains on the evidence belong to the suspect

The picture shows Li Changyu

According to US media reports, Connecticut, the United States was established to serve a sentence for murder Two defendants over 30 years ago have been convicted by the High Court of Kangzhou to revoke the charges and restore their freedom. As a criminal expert who participated in the investigation of this case, Li Changyu (Henry Chang-Yu Lee, Hnery Lee) appeared in court to give evidence and give testimony , Some media allege that Li Changyu provided inaccurate testimony and must bear responsibility for the judgment of the year. Li Changyu responded on the 14th that the charges of the two defendants were revoked because of insufficient evidence. The main witnesses in the case had passed away, and it could not be used to explain that the defendant was innocent, and he never said that the blood stains on the evidence belonged to the dead or suspect. He accused local media of one-sided reporting, damaging his reputation, and said he would resort to legal rights protection.

In 1985, 18-year-old Ralph Birch and 17-year-old Shawn Henning were suspected of murdering 65-year-old in New Milford Township, Conn. Carl, a retired truck driver, was prosecuted for felony such as murder. After the jury found the conviction, the judge sentenced the two to 50 and 55 years in prison.

getInterUrl?uicrIvZQ=dde0af95fb5598682f7b39fbab47c3a2 - Being exposed to create a"homicide case", Li Changyu:never said that the blood stains on the evidence belong to the suspect

The picture shows two men who have been over 50 years old and were accused of murder at the time

However, during the New Crown Epidemic, Dan Shaban, the judge of the High Court of Kangzhou, revoked the charges of Birch and Hanning at two private hearings, and the two were able to restore their freedom. . In this regard, the local media of Hartford News, Kangzhou, reported in the report that it was Li Changyu’s testimony that a stained towel found in the bathroom of the deceased was “blood stain”, which led to the case.”Misjudgment”.

The Hartford News said that because the victim was cut with 27 knives, the crime scene was all blood stained, but neither the two defendants nor the stolen vehicles they slept on were found. Blood stains, and a towel with suspicious stains discovered by Li Changyu who participated in the investigation, and after”repetitive testing” found that the stains on the towel were”blood stains” testimony, which led the jury to determine that the two defendants were the murderers.

In this regard, Li Changyu said on the 14th that 30 years ago, the grandmother of a defendant and one of his inmates confirmed that they personally admitted that they had stolen and killed the deceased in the deceased’s home, but now two main witnesses Both have passed away, and the other evidence is not sufficient to prosecute the defendant. The judge only revoked the charges of the two, and cannot explain the innocence of the two.

getInterUrl?uicrIvZQ=8246a5a34bb5271075b9ba8cd34de523 - Being exposed to create a"homicide case", Li Changyu:never said that the blood stains on the evidence belong to the suspect

The picture shows the crime scene at that time

Li Changyu said that the investigation process In the test result that he explained, there was no blood stains of the deceased in the clothes and cars of the two defendants. He also proved that there were blood stains on the towels of the victim’s bathroom, but he never pointed out that the blood stains came from the victim or others, and over time Over time, the evidence may be destroyed; Li Changyu criticized Kangzhou local media for one-sided coverage of the findings of the investigation.

In response to the two other”unjust cases” listed by the Hartford News, Li Changyu said that he had held a press conference last year to invite a number of mainstream media to explain the case, but the media did not show up. He criticized some defense lawyers for trying to reverse the case by damaging the reputation of expert witnesses.

getInterUrl?uicrIvZQ=e97b81c6467b2e002b0770fd3d950693 - Being exposed to create a"homicide case", Li Changyu:never said that the blood stains on the evidence belong to the suspect

The picture shows Li Changyu

An example of investigating another murder in 1986 , Li Changyu said that during the investigation, the defendant’s sneakers were found to have blood stains, but in a report in 2014, he was said to be undetectable. He explained that the blood may have been neutralized by the test fluid in the previous test, or it has been broken down because of too long. This result does not indicate that there was no blood stains 30 years ago.

Li Changyu said that in the past 30 years, there have been many advances in the science of criminal forensics, but it does not mean that past forensics was wrong. He pointed out that in order to convict the accused, multiple evidences of witness and material evidence are needed. For some media out of context, he will hire a lawyer to issue a warning letter to maintain his reputation.