Through a one-to-one decision by the US, the US media analyzed its 4 errors. US$7 billion may be spent
On July 4, the Global Times quoted CNN to analyze the &34;Pacific Deterrence Initiative (PDI)&34; proposed by the United States and said that this initiative against China will cost the United States a huge price .
The report stated that some US personnel always used the epidemic as an excuse to slandish China 34, and US officials have made statements about China’s profit through the epidemic and its intervention in the development of vaccines in the United States.
The report boils down to these claims as an exaggerated statement in the face of the upcoming US election. He also said that the most instigating method for the United States when confronting China is the”34 Pacific Deterrence Initiative (PDI)”.
According to CCTV, the United States has recently A bill was passed, which mentioned the establishment of a PDI fund and required relevant departments to provide reports on the risks of using Huawei equipment.
Military observer Meng Xiangqing analyzed that the resolution was based on the so-called”34 China threat theory”, whose purpose is to ensure that US military forces in the Indo-Pacific region can respond to China. He also said that the United States had also set up the”34 European Deterrence Plan” against Russia in 2014.
Meng Xiangqing said that through the US mention of Huawei in the bill, two conclusions can be drawn:1. The US wants to decouple China from high-tech fields; 2. It exposes that the US Congress regards China as a threat Concept.
CNN News reported that PDI indicated that it would want to enhance the military strength of the United States in missile defense and other military aspects, but there are four problems in its concept, or it will cost the United States a huge price.
1. The cost of PDI is expensive. This move will cost the US military US$7 billion in two years. Two years later, the United States will increase its investment.
2. The emergence of PDI is not necessary. The US military expenditure is 1.5 times higher than that of China. The US military strength is sufficient to deal with any impact that China may bring in the military. Moreover, there is no evidence that China wants to replace the US military position.
3. This resolution and the American people Contrary to the idea, according to a survey report issued by the Eurasian Group Foundation, the American people do not want to increase their military presence in Asia Invest.
4. The United States has invested a lot of money in PDI, on the one hand wasting resources, and on the other hand, it will increase its opposition to China. The US media said that in order to deal with the epidemic and economic recession, it should pay more attention to cooperation with China at this time.
Comprehensive Global Times Central Broadcasting Network