CBA ticket is fluttering and controversial

By yqqlm yqqlm

CBA League yesterday made a penalty decision on the controversy of the Beijing Shougang team in the 27th round:< span class=”entity-word” data-gid=”726385″>Beijing Shougang coach Xie Libin was suspended for 4 games and fined 20,000 yuan. Player Zhai Xiaochuan was fined 30,000 yuan. As soon as the news came out, it caused controversy in the outside world. In many people’s eyes, the CBA league penalizes those involved too lightly to serve as a warning.

Controversial penalties in the CBA League this season have repeatedly appeared, and the outside world has questioned the referee’s ability to enforce the law as the”normal”. Unexpectedly, this delicate balance was broken by the Beijing Shougang team. Regarding the incident itself, the outside world generally stood on the opposite side of the Beijing Shougang team, not only because some people in the circle recognized the referee on duty. To take a step back, even if the Beijing Shougang team questioned the referee’s decision, it can still be appealed in the normal way, and this kind of near-strike and chaotic behavior is just adding fuel to the fire.

The final result is nothing more than the Beijing Shougang team apologized and punished. The club introspected:“Failure to manage the team’s emotions in the game, fail to maintain the order of the game at the first time, and fail to remember to fully convey positive energy. Not only does the content that should not appear on the game affect the normal game, but also It makes fans and friends who follow the Beijing Shougang game more worried and less happy. I’m sorry.”This kind of painless hindsight confession is just a routine operation. Only they know whether it will work.

The penalty decision of the CBA League is also controversial. As the protagonist of the technical station, Zhai Xiaochuan was only fined and the coach Xie Libin who led the team to strike was only suspended for 4 games, even Not as strong as the CBA league penalties for minor misconduct this season. This result will ultimately affect the image of the CBA League.

But looking at it from another angle, among the reasons that led to the occurrence of this incident, there was dissatisfaction that the parties involved had accumulated for a long time in disputes over referee enforcement. The lack of recognition of the referee’s level of enforcement will naturally affect the participants’ subjective judgments on disputes and punishments. This point requires the CBA League to attach great importance to it.