2022-01-13

Little party, big scandal! Does the British Prime Minister violate epidemic prevention, “black hat” or not protect?

By yqqlm yqqlm

Jan. 13 (Meng Xiangjun) if you want people to know, don’t do it unless you don’t do it yourself. On the 12th local time, suffering British Prime Minister Johnson finally admitted that he had held a garden party in violation of epidemic prevention regulations and apologized

however, the angry British people did not buy it at all, and the opposition also called on Johnson to resign. Some members of the ruling conservative party even abandoned their colleagues with Johnson and began to prepare for a no confidence vote. If the vote is passed, Johnson’s throne as prime minister will really be lost

<img src=’http://image1.chinanews.com.cn/cnsupload/big/2020/04-13/4-426/85d3ec7f4315426182c066a2514d01f9.jpgThe latest news is novel coronavirus pneumonia, which is cancelled by Johnson, who is diagnosed with a new family pneumonia. />

‘s latest visit is that the family members have confirmed the new crown pneumonia. I wonder what the British political circles and people will say about this</ P>

[state officials set fire to the people, not allowing people to light the lamp]

make complaints about the social distance, while hiding the whole British party at Downing street 10 or bringing the drinks with him. Johnson’s action was severely tucking. p>

through an email, the British media ITV poked the matter out as gossip. In the email, Johnson’s chief private secretary Reynolds invited more than 100 staff to a “party to keep social distance”. Finally, about 40 people actually attended, indicating that more than half of the people were “sober”

Little party, big scandal! Does the British Prime Minister violate epidemic prevention, “black hat” or not protect?

the party scene photo taken in May 2020 shows Johnson sitting around a table with his wife Kelly and two public officials, and four people sitting around another table not far away. On one side of the lawn, nine people were talking in a circle

there is irrefutable evidence. The guardian pointed out that everyone in the photo did not maintain social distance and did not wear masks. According to the regulations at that time, there should be no more than 2 people from different families

just one hour before the party, then British health secretary Hancock also urged people to abide by epidemic prevention regulations and not “use the good weather on weekends to carry out collective social networking”

Johnson took the lead in formulating and even announcing the epidemic prevention measures in Britain. When the epidemic situation was severe, he not only did not become an example, but took the lead in “sabotage”. This is really typical. Only state officials are allowed to set fire and people are not allowed to light lights

Little party, big scandal! Does the British Prime Minister violate epidemic prevention, “black hat” or not protect?(1)

[or the tip of the iceberg, many violations]

according to Johnson, if he only stayed at a party for 25 minutes, he may not be able to arouse so much public anger. In fact, according to British media statistics, during the epidemic prevention and control period, he convened or participated in at least 13 illegal gatherings, many of which were carried out in the name of “work”

for example, the previously exposed rehearsal video of the press conference in December 2020 forced Johnson spokesman Stratton to resign. In the video, Strauss and the staff joked with each other about the “Christmas party” held during the blockade of No. 10 Downing Street, saying it was a “party without social distance restrictions” and “collusion” as a cover

Little party, big scandal! Does the British Prime Minister violate epidemic prevention, “black hat” or not protect?(2)

the media believe that 40 to 50 people may be crowded in one room at the party, and London was under the third level of prevention and control at that time

Stratton’s remarks eventually caused “disaster” and had to announce his resignation. After she left, Johnson said he missed her</ Novel coronavirus pneumonia, which Johnson once infected with new crown pneumonia, has been once introduced into intensive care unit. It is a person who has passed through the gate of hell but has nothing to do with the safety and health of himself and his side. P>

p>

now, the British people are beginning to doubt that what has been exposed may only be the tip of the iceberg. Johnson may be better at being a “party king” than being prime minister

Little party, big scandal! Does the British Prime Minister violate epidemic prevention, “black hat” or not protect?(3)

British Labour leader stammer wrote on social media that “the party is over” and called on Johnson to resign

[touch the pain point, “black hat” or no protection?]

this is “a slap in the face of the British public”. Reina, deputy leader of the British opposition Labor Party, described Johnson’s party photos. Labor leader stammer also accused the Prime Minister of cheating the public for months. Now “the party is over”, Johnson should resign. The SNP said the party was “totally intolerable”

according to the analysis, Johnson is facing greater pressure to step down this round than ever before, and is also despised in the ruling conservative party. In the past, conservative colleagues on his side have publicly criticized him, and more than one-third of the party’s members believe that Boris should resign

it is also the British people who feel cheated. A YouGov poll of 5391 people found that 56% thought the prime minister should resign. The savanta comres poll showed that 66% thought Johnson needed to resign, up 12% compared with the poll at the “Christmas party”

Little party, big scandal! Does the British Prime Minister violate epidemic prevention, “black hat” or not protect?(4)

Johnson’s actions again and again touched the emotional pain points of the people. Many people wrote online and denounced him as a “serial liar”

some nurses exposed the deep marks of their masks, saying that they had not seen their family for nine weeks in order to save their lives, but the prime minister was with his family and ignored the epidemic prevention regulations

netizens have pointed out that when people can only hug their children through plastic cloth, stand outside the window to visit their seriously ill mother, or because the epidemic can’t get close to their dead relatives, they can only watch their relatives’ last journey in one side’s car, the prime minister, who should be the most trusted person in this country, runs naked in the virus, drinks and eats cheese

now, embattled Johnson cannot admit, “we just did something wrong, and I must be responsible”

this apology has been one and a half years since the party. Shadow health minister strittin concluded: “this is not an apology, this is the most shameful performance of the prime minister in the house of Commons in people’s memory.”

Little party, big scandal! Does the British Prime Minister violate epidemic prevention, “black hat” or not protect?(5)

another interesting detail is that the parliamentary picture shows that Johnson did not wear a mask even if he apologized for not doing well in epidemic prevention. And all the Congressmen who looked at him wore masks

next, Johnson must wait for the result of his reckless “trial”. The Prime Minister of a great country may lose his “black hat” in order to create some “small happiness”. It’s not worth it! (end)